Absurd relativity

Einstein defined time as length of the light path divided by the speed of light. According to this definition, time can only change if either the length of the light path or the speed of light changes. Einstein replaced this objective mathematical truth with his idea that not only is the speed of light constant, but also the length of the light path, so that Einstein was able to define a constant proper time t0 in all frames of reference. However, treating the lengths of light paths as constant contradicts the physical definition of motion. Therefore, Einstein’s relativity not only violates mathematical and physical rules, but also violates logical rules when it claims that the reason why clocks measure different times is that all clocks measure the same time t0. Einstein’s physical half-truth, which makes a false statement about the lengths of light paths, which cannot be constant, leads to contradictions with reality, which Einstein compensated for by mathematical corrections. This inevitably led to a mathematical pseudo-reality that is described by theoretical physics according to Einstein’s idea. However, Einstein’s principle of relativity cannot be mathematically manipulated. If we compare at least three reference frames, we obtain contradictory results for the kinematic and gravitational time dilation. In this case, for example, the paradox arises that an atomic clock must be able to count forwards and backwards at the same time. Comparing only two frames of reference, the proper time t0 can be arbitrarily assigned to each of the two frames of reference without contradictions occurring. However, if an experimental setup is always chosen in such a way that at most two frames of reference are compared, and so Einstein’s relativity cannot be falsified, a systematic error is applied and the experiment is scientifically worthless as far as the confirmation of Einstein’s relativistic SR and GR is concerned.